I really do need to make time to take a deep look at what you have done with the xslt3-subset implementation. You have gotten farther with it that I would have expected without deeper redesign of the system.
-- /_ Joe Kesselman (he/him/his) -/ _) My Alexa skill for New Music/New Sounds fans: / https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09WJ3H657/ Caveat: Opinionated old geezer with overcompensated writer's block. May be redundant, verbose, prolix, sesquipedalian, didactic, officious, or redundant. ________________________________ From: Gary Gregory <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, March 3, 2025 8:47:15 AM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: xalan-j's xslt 3.0 implementation status I don't have an opinion on these APIs. I would like to get a new 2.x release out to make sure we push out any bugs fixes. Getting a beta out for the new XSLT 3 code would be nice as well. Gary On Mon, Mar 3, 2025, 05:43 Mukul Gandhi <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi all, As per my knowledge, the following XSLT 3.0's significant features are yet to be implemented within Xalan-J's XSL 3 dev repos branch. xsl:merge xsl:fork xsl:mode Streaming (XSLT 3.0 spec's section 18) I'm curious whether anyone is interested to have these XSL 3 features implemented within Xalan-J? Any thoughts from Gary & Joseph shall be great to know. Many thanks. -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi (alt email : [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
