soap:Body children in envelope should be namespace qualified
------------------------------------------------------------
Key: XFIRE-850
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/XFIRE-850
Project: XFire
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 1.2.4
Reporter: Fernando Schapachnik
Assigned To: Dan Diephouse
(Opening this issue per request on the mailing list.)
We're using rpc/literal encoding for the messages,
XFire Eclipse plugin to develop the server side and JWSDP to develop
the client side, the problem is:
We send a message like the following to the server and it works fine,
but the client can't process the response:
---- REQUEST ----
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";>
<soapenv:Body>
<ans:methodName xmlns:ans="http://my.namespace";>
<parameter1>
<item1>value1</item1>
<item2>value2</item2>
</parameter1>
</ans:methodName>
</soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>
---- RESPONSE ----
<soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";>
<soap:Body>
<methodNameResponse xmlns="http://my.namespace";>
<ns2:methodNameResult xmlns:ns2="http://my.namespace";>
<!-- Parameters with correct values -->
</ns2:methodNameResult>
</methodNameResponse>
</soap:Body>
</soap:Envelope>
So, searching on the ws-i, Basic Profile 1.1 we found this:
/"3.1.3 SOAP Body Namespace Qualification/
/The use of unqualified element names may cause naming conflicts,
therefore qualified names must be used for the children of soap:Body./
/ R1014 The children of the soap:Body element in an ENVELOPE MUST
be namespace qualified."/
then we assume that the problem is in this line of the response
" <methodNameResponse xmlns="http://my.namespace";> "
so, we made a server (hardcoded) that returns the same response
message but with the previous line like this :
" <ns1:methodNameResponse xmlns:ns1="http://my.namespace";> "
and everything works just fine. The problem seems to be related to rpc/literal
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
