[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/XFIRE-884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_88625
]
Julius Davies commented on XFIRE-884:
-------------------------------------
I see this committed to SVN:
Map headersMap = (Map) context.getContextualProperty(HTTP_HEADERS);
if (headersMap != null) {
for (Iterator iter = headersMap.entrySet().iterator(); iter.hasNext();) {
Map.Entry entry = (Entry) iter.next();
postMethod.addRequestHeader(entry.getKey().toString(),
entry.getValue().toString());
}
}
I like the Object.toString()! That could come in handy.
Is the support for several headers (so checking for instanceof Object[]) with
the same name not desirable?
Just curious if the String[] idea was a bad one.
> Add support for custom HTTP headers
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: XFIRE-884
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/XFIRE-884
> Project: XFire
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Tomasz Sztelak
> Assigned To: Tomasz Sztelak
> Fix For: 1.2.5
>
> Attachments: http-header.patch
>
>
> It would be good to have a way to specify custom http headers
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email