I was thinking about it :) I couldn't decide which version is better,
so i use the first one i created. But now i see that using
DOMOutHandler will be probably better for users :)
I'll try to fix this today later.
On 3/2/07, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Tomeks - why don't you just add
getBefore().add(FaultSoapSerializerHandler.class.getName());
to the DOMOutHandler? It won't harm anything.
- Dan
On 28 Feb 2007 08:38:31 -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> Revision 2097 Author tomeks Date 2007-02-28 02:38:30 -0600 (Wed, 28 Feb
2007)
> Log Message XFIRE-890 - allows dom handler per service
>
> Added Paths
>
>
trunk/xfire/xfire-core/src/main/org/codehaus/xfire/util/dom/DOMFaultHandler.java
>
> Diff
>
> Added:
trunk/xfire/xfire-core/src/main/org/codehaus/xfire/util/dom/DOMFaultHandler.java
(0 => 2097) ---
trunk/xfire/xfire-core/src/main/org/codehaus/xfire/util/dom/DOMFaultHandler.java
(rev 0)
> +++
trunk/xfire/xfire-core/src/main/org/codehaus/xfire/util/dom/DOMFaultHandler.java
2007-02-28 08:38:30 UTC (rev 2097)
>
> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> +package org.codehaus.xfire.util.dom;
> +
> +import
org.codehaus.xfire.soap.handler.FaultSoapSerializerHandler;
> +
> +/**
> + * <a href="mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">Tomasz Sztelak</a>
> + *
> + */
> +public class DOMFaultHandler extends DOMOutHandler {
> +
> + public DOMFaultHandler(){
> + super();
> +
getBefore().add(FaultSoapSerializerHandler.class.getName
> ());
> +
> + }
> +
> +}
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
>
> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
--
Dan Diephouse
Envoi Solutions
http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
--
-----
When one of our products stops working, we'll blame another vendor
within 24 hours.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
