On 11/10/05, Bruce D'Arcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We want to dramatically improve the bibliographic support in OOo to not > just match commercial Word-oriented competition, but to exceed them.
> > If we do this, OOo instantly becomes REALLY attractive to higher ed. > Might be silly Bruce, but if you are trying to please a number of users; how about splitting it (to ease processing and reduce compromises). E.g. select 2 or 3 major audiences, and have them select one input mechanism, which may (or may not) align with a processing model (e.g. Latex target or other). That way the work can be made more robust and better aligned with 'traditions' going back ..... you name it. Just a suggestion -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
