I'm also +1 for the 0.2.1 proposal. 2016-03-22 2:55 GMT+09:00 Chris Nauroth <[email protected]>:
> +1 for the 0.2.1 proposal. > > Thanks also to Kengo for volunteering to do the next one. > > --Chris Nauroth > > > > > On 3/21/16, 8:20 AM, "Sean Busbey" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Would anyone mind if I made a 0.2.1 release while Kengo works on > >getting 0.3.0 out at the end of the week? > > > >It'd just be 0.2.0 plus the fix for YETUS-334. It's severely bloating > >HBase's precommit build times (like adding ~2 hours). > > > >On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Kengo Seki <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Sorry for the late response, but could you let me try it? > >> If it's OK, I'd like to create a RC by the next weekend, because I need > >> some preparation such as reading relevant docs and some trial-and-error, > >> and I think YETUS-329 and YETUS-338 should be committed before creating > >>a > >> RC (I'll review them today). > >> > >> 2016-03-19 0:30 GMT+09:00 Sean Busbey <[email protected]>: > >> > >>> Now that YETUS-334 and YETUS-335 are in place, I'd like there to be a > >>> release in short order. > >>> > >>> I believe I owe Andrew W a review and compatibility addendum on > >>> YETUS-326, which I'd prefer to get in today so that it can be in a > >>> soon-release. > >>> > >>> I also owe Allen a fix for YETUS-328, but that should be doable this > >>> morning. > >>> > >>> Anyone willing to volunteer as RM with time late today / this weekend? > >>> I'm told that the guide is pretty easy to follow. ;) > >>> > >>> -Sean > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Kengo Seki <[email protected]> > > > > -- Kengo Seki <[email protected]>
