I prefer the latter.

Thanks,
Akira

On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 4:38 AM Allen Wittenauer <a...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
>         I’m implementing the latter as YETUS-794.
>
>
> > On Feb 8, 2019, at 8:54 AM, Allen Wittenauer <a...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> >       In some of the source trees I’m working with, there are a bunch of 
> > imported files from other places that we don’t technically control (e.g., 
> > vendor files).  Needless to say, the files don’t conform to what Yetus 
> > thinks is quality content and need to be excluded from the tests.  
> > Originally I was thinking that we would add an exclusion file for each 
> > test.  But now I’m thinking we would be better off just having one big one 
> > that we could apply to as many outputs as possible:
> >
> >       For example:
> >
> > Per-test
> >
> > --shellcheck-exclude=/path/to/list
> > --pylint-exclude=/path/to/list
> > --rubocopy-exclude=/path/to/list
> >
> > Global
> >
> > --exclude-list=/path/to/list
> >
> > Thoughts?
>

Reply via email to