> The mission of Yetus is the creation and maintenance of software related to > Collection of libraries and tools that enable contribution and release > processes for software projects
Is this really our mission statement? It's so wordy. Can we simplify to "The mission of Apache Yetus is to streamline the contribution and release process for large software projects" ? The report itself looks good to me, +1 On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 6:50 PM Allen Wittenauer <a...@effectivemachines.com.invalid> wrote: > ## Description: > The mission of Yetus is the creation and maintenance of software related > to > Collection of libraries and tools that enable contribution and release > processes for software projects > > ## Issues: > There are no issues requiring board attention. > > ## Membership Data: > Apache Yetus was founded 2015-09-15 (4 years ago) > There are currently 12 committers and 9 PMC members in this project. > The Committer-to-PMC ratio is 4:3. > > Community changes, past quarter: > - No new PMC members. Last addition was Akira Ajisaka on 2018-12-17. > - No new committers. Last addition was Akira Ajisaka on 2018-02-06. > > ## Project Activity: > Patches are trickling in for an eventual 0.12.0 release! It looks like > we have folks using Apache Yetus in new and interesting ways and hitting > bugs and/or missing features or usability problems. Frankly, it is quite > exciting and hope it leads to more community growth which will lead to more > contributions which will lead to more committers which will lead to more > PMC members. > > That said, given some of the critical issues that have been filed, > a 0.12.0 will come sooner rather than later . . . > > > ## Community Health: > As usual, a new year == more activity. But to me the interesting thing > is how much our workflows are moving to GitHub vs. JIRA+mailing lists: > > > While both have had interesting discussions just in the past month, there > is no denying where stuff is happening: > > * dev@yetus.apache.org had a 30% decrease in traffic in the > past quarter (33 emails compared to 47) > * git...@yetus.apache.org had a 237% increase in traffic in the > past quarter (118 emails compared to 35) > > Our workflow is basically open a JIRA, then either open a GitHub PR > with your change or attach a patch file to JIRA. It's obvious what > is the preferred path: > > * 26 issues opened in JIRA, past quarter (73% increase) > * 16 issues closed in JIRA, past quarter (220% increase) > > * 18 PRs opened on GitHub, past quarter (200% increase) > * 16 PRs closed on GitHub, past quarter (220% increase) > > >
