Dear Philipp,

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Philipp Buluschek <
[email protected]> wrote:

>  Dear Stefano
>
> While I understand your arguments historically, I think this decision
> should be questioned today.
>
> Regarding configuration through System Properties. Even when running ZB4O
> without an OSGi framework, providing the configuration in a ConfigAdmin
> compatible way is as simple as passing a Dictionary to update(). I very
> small helper class which reads System Properties and encapsulates them in a
> Dictionary would do the trick and allow those using OSGi (a majority I
> guess) to fully profit of ConfigAdmin advantages.
>

I agree on this, it will be simple to split OSGi-ware from Plain Java part.


>
> Regarding backwards compatibility: Java 5 which introduced generics is now
> 10 years old. Do you know of users which still rely on a 1.4 JVM?
> Currently all kinds of platforms have a valid modern JVM - in particular
> Oracle is strongly going into this by providing full Java SE 8 VMs for ARM
> systems. I guess it is not a large break to pass on to the next step.
>

I know that some telco provider that want to use cheap HW cannot afford
Java 5 running on their chip because there is no support.


>
> Regarding OSGi 3 vs. 4: I'm not sure, but would guess that an external
> dependency management system (eg. Felix DM) which is not part of the OSGi
> spec can also run on OSGi 3. All the basic service functionalities haven't
> changed. If you are interested, I could investigate this.
>

I would appreciate if you some time to spend on this topic :)


>
> Regards Philipp
>

Ciao,
Stefano


>
>
>
> On 13.01.2015 11:50, Stefano Lenzi wrote:
>
> Dear Philipp,
>
> please se my comment inline...
>
> Il 13/01/2015 09:32, Philipp Buluschek ha scritto:
>
> Dear all
>
> I see that diverse ideas point at refactoring parts of ZB4O. I suggest
> that we refactor ZB4O to use a dependency manager, which would result in
> cleaner and more robust code:
>
> Currently all Service and Config dependencies are handled explicitly by
> hand. This makes it very hard to get right, as any service might appear or
> disappear at any time and dependent services must then adapt. Also, the
> current code uses a mix of ConfigAdmin values, System Properties, and
> BundleContext properties to configure the run time.
>
>
> The original idea was to enable no-OSGi user to use part of ZB4O as
> library that's why some part of the code are based on System properties for
> configuration, I think that the idea is still valuable but we may have to
> provide a better separation.
>
> This could easily be refactored to uniformly use ConfigAdmin with a
> dependency manager. OSGi offers diverse possibilities to handle these
> dependencies automatically and cleanly using a dependency managers, of
> which the mains are: Declarative services, Blueprint, iPOJO and Felix DM.
>
> In my code, I use Felix DM very successfully.
>
> Using a dependency manager would result in cleaner code because all the
> OSGi "plumbing" (which service needs what other service and what config to
> work) is being done in one single place, outside the code (or with
> annotations). This also results in the objects having less dependencies on
> the org.osgi packages.
>
>
> The rationale for not using any dependency manager is that our goal was to
> target OSGi v3 running on JVM 1.4 at most, thus there was no chance to use
> any Dependency Manager.  So, unless some architecural change is needed, I
> would avoid to introduce any spec of OSGi v4, which will increase the
> footprint for executing ZB4O.
>
>
> What do you think about this?
> Regards
>   Philipp
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing 
> [email protected]http://zb4osgi.aaloa.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
>
> --
> ________________________________________
>
>  Philipp Buluschek, Dr.-Ing.
>  Adhoco AG
>  Althardstr. 70
>  CH-8105 Regensdorf
>
>  Phone:  +41 52 264 5081
>  Mobile: +41 79 800 8218
> ________________________________________
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://zb4osgi.aaloa.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://zb4osgi.aaloa.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to