rickchengx commented on pull request #4174: URL: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/4174#issuecomment-895830239
> Instead of creating a ClusterRole and a ClusterRoleBinding, I would prefer an additional blueprint with a Role and a RoleBinding. Inside the RoleBinding the user has to replace the Namespace. But if `zeppelin server` needs to create interpreter pod in another namespace, its service account needs to be granted a `clusterrolebinding` because a `rolebinding` only grants permissions within a specific namespace. What do you think? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@zeppelin.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
