+1 for adding SBT. (in the future...)

I found that SBT is quite good for faster iteration process of development.
(with SBT '~' command, it will continuously and incrementally build your
project)
I think that's why Apache Spark project is maintaining Maven and SBT both.

Regards,
Kevin


On Mon Jan 12 2015 at 6:50:54 PM Eric Charles <e...@apache.org> wrote:

> -1
>
> IMHO Maven is good enough for what it needs now.
> SBT would be another option and a more natural fit, especially if we
> plan to add more "scala-like" frameworks in the future (Play...).
>
> Anyway, would it make sense that I jump as maintainer of maven pom(s),
> adding SBT in the future?
> Having two build systems is not ideal, but can help some guys and have a
> broader coverage.
>
> Thx, Eric
>
>
> On 01/12/2015 09:50 AM, Kevin Kim (Sangwoo) wrote:
> > +1 for gradle,
> > I like it much than maven, too.
> > On Mon Jan 12 2015 at 5:13:17 PM Anthony Corbacho <
> > anthonycorba...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> If we can come up with a list of things that we need, I can add them.
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 5:02 PM, moon soo Lee <m...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> it's been very long to have that PR open. I guess it is not that simple
> >> job
> >>> to make all behavior working just as current mvn.
> >>> If it takes too long, i think we can discuss minimum requirement of
> >> gradle
> >>> build. With quick minimum build support pushed to source tree, maybe we
> >> can
> >>> attract people who prefer use gradle and can get chances of feedback
> and
> >>> improvements.
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> moon
> >>>
> >>> 2015년 1월 12일 월요일, Alex B.<b...@apache.org>님이 작성한 메시지:
> >>>
> >>>> Same here, enthusiastic +1 for gradle
> >>>>
> >>>> After years of mvn I would rather prefer gradle now, although better
> to
> >>>> exercise caution here as having a full featured programming language
> in
> >>>> build file may make things unnecessary complicated too.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <
> >> ro...@shaposhnik.org
> >>>> <javascript:;>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 11:34 PM, Anthony Corbacho
> >>>>> <anthonycorba...@apache.org <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Few month back, I started to work on integrating Gradle to zeppelin
> >>>> (pull
> >>>>>> request: pull/171 <https://github.com/NFLabs/zeppelin/pull/171>)
> >>> But I
> >>>>>> didnt had the time to finish and complete it :(
> >>>>>> So the question here is more like, Should we keep on and try to
> >>> switch
> >>>>> from
> >>>>>> mvn to gradle?
> >>>>>> What do you think guys?
> >>>>> FWIW: I'm a huge fan of gradle. Not sure if I can promise
> >>>>> to commit coding cycles, but at least I can share my experiences
> >>>>> via answering questions, etc.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Roman.
> >>>>>
>

Reply via email to