On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 2:43 PM, tog <guillaume.all...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Would like to see the data validation & maps handling in that 5.x ;-) > +1 :) > > Cheers > Guillaume > > On 8 September 2015 at 08:39, DuyHai Doan <doanduy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello moon > > > > "When we create release branch?" --> As soon as major features that > should > > be in the 0.5 release are committed and tested at least once > > > > "How we create branch?" --> We can take your approach with cherry-picking > > but there is a risk of merge issue if we do not cherry-pick dependent > > changes. For example if we want only features B & C in the release branch > > but if they depend on feature A, code-wise, we may have trouble. > > > > "How do we handle FixVersion tag of JIRA issue?" --> tag 0.5.x as you > > suggested. We'll replace x with the real minor version for bug fix > commits > > > > By the way, do we have a clear list of all features/JIRA that will be in > > the train of 0.5 release ? I'm been quite busy recently so I did not > follow > > up closely all the JIRAs > > > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Amos B. Elberg <amos.elb...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Can we get the rinterpreter in? > > > > > > > On Sep 7, 2015, at 1:17 PM, moon soo Lee <m...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > Looks like we have consensus of having 0.5.x release. > > > > > > > > Then, how about following steps for the release? > > > > > > > > 1. Create a release branch. (That means freeze the code, release > > branch > > > > only receives bug fix) > > > > 2. Create rc artifacts from the release branch > > > > 3. Test rc artifacts, fix bugs. Vote for release, iterate 2-3 > > > > 4. Release > > > > > > > > Here's some decisions to be made. > > > > > > > > When we create release branch? > > > > How we create branch? > > > > How do we handle FixVersion tag of JIRA issue? > > > > > > > > To me, a week later (14/sept), cherry picking master branch to > existing > > > > branch "branch-0.5" for creating release branch. And add 0.5.x for > > > > FixVersion for the JIRA issues included in this branch. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 10:53 PM Anthony Corbacho < > > > > anthonycorba...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > >> I think its okay to release often minor change (something like > 0.5.x). > > > >>> On Aug 30, 2015 1:57 PM, "Alexander Bezzubov" <b...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> Enthusiastic +1 on soon 0.5.x release! > > > >>> Great job has been done by the whole community indeed. > > > >>> Then we can release 0.6.0 as soon as the scope is there. > > > >>> > > > >>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:40 PM, Amos B. Elberg < > > > amos.elb...@gmail.com> > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> +1 on interim release. There have been so many changes it would be > > > >>> helpful > > > >>>> to have a more stable code base to develop against. Any way R > could > > > get > > > >>>> into that as an experimental feature? > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> On Aug 28, 2015, at 3:03 AM, moon soo Lee <m...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> About tracking number downloads > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Currently download button just redirects browser to > > > >>> > > > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/incubator/zeppelin/0.5.0-incubating > > > >>>> . > > > >>>>> Is there any way to get download number from apache.org/dyn? > > > >>>>> Otherwise we need implant some tracking code into the download > > > >> button. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Thanks, > > > >>>>> moon > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:59 PM DuyHai Doan < > > doanduy...@gmail.com> > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> +1 for the release. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Agree with IT CTO that it would also be interesting to know how > > many > > > >>>> people > > > >>>>>> are downloading the built version, but I guess we can have the > > > >>> download > > > >>>>>> statistics from Apache repo, don't we ? > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 8:48 AM, tog < > guillaume.all...@gmail.com > > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> While it is important to understand the traction the project > has > > by > > > >>>>>> getting > > > >>>>>>> the number of downloads we have had with the first release, I > > > >> believe > > > >>>> it > > > >>>>>> is > > > >>>>>>> more important to show that the project is progressing well by > > > >>>> providing > > > >>>>>>> new releases. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> +1 for an intermediate release > > > >>>>>>>> On Aug 28, 2015 6:59 AM, "IT CTO" <goi....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> I agree a great progress has been made but before we invest > time > > > >> in > > > >>>>>>>> releasing do we have a record of how meny people use the > > released > > > >>>>>> version > > > >>>>>>>> and not build from source? > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> בתאריך יום ו׳, 28 באוג׳ 2015, 08:47 מאת moon soo Lee < > > > >>> m...@apache.org > > > >>>>>>> : > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Hi, > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> I'd like to discuss about upcoming release. > > > >>>>>>>>> A lot of improvements have been made since 0.5.0-incubating > > > >>> release. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> 4 Interpreters are added (there're more work in progress), > > > >>>>>>>>> security for websocket and rest api are improved, > > > >>>>>>>>> ux improved a lot, > > > >>>>>>>>> more documentation, > > > >>>>>>>>> many bug fixes, > > > >>>>>>>>> and so on > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> I think improvements are good enough to make a release. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> However, next version, 0.6.0 is not completely done according > > to > > > >>> the > > > >>>>>>>>> roadmap. > > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZEPPELIN/Zeppelin+Roadmap > > > >>> . > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> So, how about having one more 0.5.x release before 0.6.0? > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > >>>>>>>>> moon > > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > PGP KeyID: 2048R/EA31CFC9 subkeys.pgp.net > -- Cheers, Madhuka Udantha http://madhukaudantha.blogspot.com
