Oh, I'm sorry. Thank you. Good point. I am in favor for the release of the 0.5.6-incubating.
2015-12-29 19:56 GMT-08:00 Amos B. Elberg <amos.elb...@gmail.com>: > Chae-Sung — What Moon has proposed is a 0.5.6 release *without* Shiro. > > From: Chae-Sung Lim <estai...@gmail.com> <estai...@gmail.com> > Reply: dev@zeppelin.incubator.apache.org > <dev@zeppelin.incubator.apache.org> <dev@zeppelin.incubator.apache.org> > Date: December 29, 2015 at 10:53:43 PM > > To: dev@zeppelin.incubator.apache.org <dev@zeppelin.incubator.apache.org> > <dev@zeppelin.incubator.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release 0.5.6-incubating > > It is a good idea. > I think that security is an enhanced version of the release is required by > the current Zeppelin. > (Shiro) > > 2015-12-29 19:32 GMT-08:00 Amos B. Elberg <amos.elb...@gmail.com>: > > > I don’t want to come off as the naysayer here, but I think the effort > that > > would go into a release would be better spent on the testing > infrastructure > > and outstanding PRs. > > > > If we feel we need a release for 1.6 and Ignite, I suggest we make a > > release that *only* includes the absolute minimal changes required to do > > that. > > > > There was one PR for 1.6 support that didn’t really work and is going to > > break anything built against the current codebase. Except for a change > in > > the name of one method called by one class, all of the changes seem to > > involve support for spark-under-zeppelin, which is something we want to > > take out. > > > > We also don’t currently have a working testing framework. A lot of PRs > > have been committed under the “ignore travis its broken” theory. I’m > > loathe to make a release that hasn’t really been tested, and it doesn’t > > seem we’re in a position to do that. > > > > While there have been a lot of merged PRs, I don’t think any of them are > > on-roadmap. They mostly seem to be very minor, like fixing typos and > > changing which text box gets highlighted. Those are important things, of > > course, but not major enough to justify the effort involved in a > release. > > > > Another release will not make it easier to integrate the larger PRs. It > > will have the opposite effect. Developers will have to rebase against > > whatever gets broken by 1.6 and other changes. > > > > I suggest we wait to do a significant release until we can take out the > > legacy spark-under-zeppelin code that has caused so many issues, have a > > working testing framework, and integrate the major outstanding PRs. > > > > So, again, if we want a release, I suggest we include the absolute > minimum > > changes necessary for 1.6 and Ignite, and perhaps call it an interim or > > maintenance release. > > > > > > From: Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> > > Reply: dev@zeppelin.incubator.apache.org < > > dev@zeppelin.incubator.apache.org>, dev@zeppelin.incubator.apache.org < > > dev@zeppelin.incubator.apache.org> > > Date: December 29, 2015 at 10:05:36 PM > > To: dev@zeppelin.incubator.apache.org <dev@zeppelin.incubator.apache.org> > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release 0.5.6-incubating > > > > Good idea! BTW, Apache Ignite is voting right now on 1.5.0.final - would > > make > > sense to add this to the latest release of Zeppelin. I will open a JIRA > and > > supply a patch for it, if there's no objections. > > > > Cos > > > > On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 03:00AM, moon soo Lee wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > How about we make release 0.5.6-incubating? > > > > > > Since last release, more than 100 pull requests are merged and more > than > > 80 > > > issues are resolved. > > > > > > It's including new interpreters, a lot of new features and improvement > on > > > GUI with much improved stability thanks to lots of bug fixes. > > > > > > Also it's great time to have a Zeppelin release that support Spark 1.6 > ( > > > ZEPPELIN-395), which about to be released. > > > > > > Once we branch for 0.5.6-incubating release, it's more safe to make > large > > > code base change such as "Added Shiro security" ( > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/53) and many other > > > planned feature in 0.6.0 roadmap, that will require lots of internal > API > > > updates. > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > moon > > > >
