Hello guys While developing a new feature, I can see some inconsistencies in the design of the AngularObjecRegistry and RemoteAngularObjectRegistry classes.
The remote class extends the base AngularObjecRegistry class, so it also inherits the values HashMap. The problem is that this value HashMap is JVM-local, therefore, there are some methods like addAndNotifyRemoteProcess() and removeAndNotifyRemoteProcess() to add/remove variables to/from the remote registry. So far so good. But then there is no method to read/check the presence of a variable from the remote registry. Calling get() only read the local HashMap .... Ideally, the addAndNotifyRemoteProcess() should be renamed add() and override the add() method of the base AngularObjecRegistry class. Same idea for removeAndNotifyRemoteProcess() method. If we are dealing with a remote registry, that make senses that we do not use the JVM-local HashMap. What do you think about the idea ? Is there any use-case where we DO need to access the local HashMap for a RemoteAngularObjectRegistry instance ? Remarks are welcomed Regards
