Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/835#issuecomment-210780122
  
    Maybe i didn't explained very well. :-)
    
    I think having another mechanism that register interpreter based on 
information in json file, in addition to current `Class.forName` is good idea.
    
    In short, Instead of single `interpreter-setting.json` for all 
interpreters, if each interpreter can have own json file then it would be much 
easier to aligned with ZEPPELIN-598 and ZEPPELIN-533 in the future.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to