I think a repo rename is reasonable. I'll raise a ticket and see what infra says.
Cheers Niclas On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Paul Merlin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Sandro, > > Sandro Martini a écrit : > > Hi Paul, > > I think a rename now would be better now, but maybe the same rename > > should be done in many other places (docs, etc) to reduce possible > > confusion even there. > We already renamed everything except java packages for 2.1 (in order to > keep backward compatibility with 2.0). > See the `develop` documentation > at:https://zest.apache.org/java/develop/index.html . > > In 3.0 we will rename the java packages, see ZEST-40. > > To rename the git repository we need to open a INFRA issue. > Then we should impact builds.apache.org jobs configuration, and of > course, our git clones. > Am I right? > > Cheers > > /Paul > > -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java
