| I'm sorry for not replying before. I didn't feel that the message was for me, since it should be pretty obvious that I'm interested in those projects. Here are some thoughts, though: - It would be really nice to have committers for bookkeeper/hedwig; - It would be really nice to have independent releases for bookkeeper/hedwig; - It sounds like bookkeeper and hedwig don't always go together, and hdfs is an instance in which it happens. But, hedwig builds on top of bookkeeper (and other components), so using hedwig implies using bookkeeper. Consequently, if we choose only one to be a main project, perhaps bookkeeper would be a better choice; - I don't think we have anyone who could be a project lead for these projects right now, so it could be a problem to split up at this point. For this reason, a zookeeper subproject sounds like a better option compared to incubator, unless we are able to find a project lead. -Flavio On Mar 2, 2011, at 6:55 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
flavio junqueira research scientist [email protected] direct +34 93-183-8828 avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es phone (408) 349 3300 fax (408) 349 3301 |
- [DISCUSS] move hedwig/bookkeeper to subproject Benjamin Reed
- Re: [DISCUSS] move hedwig/bookkeeper to subproject Flavio Junqueira
- Re: [DISCUSS] move hedwig/bookkeeper to subproje... Patrick Hunt
- Re: [DISCUSS] move hedwig/bookkeeper to subp... Mahadev Konar
- Re: [DISCUSS] move hedwig/bookkeeper to ... Dhruba Borthakur
- Re: [DISCUSS] move hedwig/bookkeepe... Ivan Kelly
- Re: [DISCUSS] move hedwig/bookk... Flavio Junqueira
- Re: [DISCUSS] move hedwig/bookk... Benjamin Reed
- Re: [DISCUSS] move hedwig/bookkeeper to subproject Patrick Hunt
