[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1018?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Stephen Tyree updated ZOOKEEPER-1018:
-------------------------------------

    Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-1018.patch

Patch to implement the enhancement.

> The connection permutation in get_addrs uses a weak and inefficient shuffle
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-1018
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1018
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: c client
>    Affects Versions: 3.3.2
>            Reporter: Stephen Tyree
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-1018.patch, zookeeper.c.patch
>
>   Original Estimate: 2h
>  Remaining Estimate: 2h
>
> After determining all of the addresses in the get_addrs function in the C 
> client, the connection is permuted using the following code:
>         setup_random();
>         /* Permute */
>         for(i = 0; i < zh->addrs_count; i++) {
>             struct sockaddr_storage *s1 = zh->addrs + 
> random()%zh->addrs_count;
>             struct sockaddr_storage *s2 = zh->addrs + 
> random()%zh->addrs_count;
>             if (s1 != s2) {
>                 struct sockaddr_storage t = *s1;
>                 *s1 = *s2;
>                 *s2 = t;
>             }
>         }
> Not only does this shuffle produce an uneven permutation, but it is half as 
> efficient as the Fisher-Yates shuffle which produces an unbiased one. It 
> seems like it would be a simple fix to increase the randomness and efficiency 
> of the shuffle by switching over to using Fisher-Yates.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to