no timestamp are needed, sort children only by the child name and the comparator can be specified in a config file for each parent
On 3/16/11, MIS <[email protected]> wrote: > If the children are added by prefixing a time-stamp, then once the children > are obtained using the existing API, then sorting the obtained children is > easy. > > I remember there was once a discussion to provide an API to get the children > in order, don't know what happened to it. > > Thanks, > MIS. > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 2:46 PM, jiangwen w <[email protected]> wrote: > >> how do you think about let the children in order and provide some API to >> access some of all children under a node. >> also let the user specify the comparator. order is very important in some >> applications. >> I am very happy to provide a patch for this. >> >> Sincerely >> >
