[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13010479#comment-13010479
]
Maya D commented on ZOOKEEPER-866:
----------------------------------
>From some preliminary experiments we found the transaction log I/O to be a
>bottleneck. I'm now experimenting with putting the transaction log on a 256M
>RAM disk, setting forceSync=no, and bumping up snapCount to 500K or 1M. In our
>case we don't care about persistence, and we are fine with loosing state on a
>server crash.
> Adding no disk persistence option in zookeeper.
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-866
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-866
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Mahadev konar
> Assignee: Mahadev konar
> Fix For: 3.4.0
>
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-nodisk.patch
>
>
> Its been seen that some folks would like to use zookeeper for very fine
> grained locking. Also, in there use case they are fine with loosing all old
> zookeeper state if they reboot zookeeper or zookeeper goes down. The use case
> is more of a runtime locking wherein forgetting the state of locks is
> acceptable in case of a zookeeper reboot. Not logging to disk allows high
> throughput on and low latency on the writes to zookeeper. This would be a
> configuration option to set (ofcourse the default would be logging to disk).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
