[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Patrick Hunt updated ZOOKEEPER-1489:
------------------------------------

             Priority: Blocker  (was: Critical)
    Affects Version/s: 3.3.5
        Fix Version/s: 3.5.0
                       3.4.4
                       3.3.6

I looked at the code for this and I agree, it seems the existing txn log is not 
being repositioned. I'll work on some tests and a patch for this.

Thanks Christian!
                
> Data loss after truncate on transaction log
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-1489
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1489
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: server
>    Affects Versions: 3.4.3, 3.3.5
>         Environment: Tested on Ubuntu 12.04 and CentOS 6, should be 
> reproducible elsewhere
>            Reporter: Christian Ziech
>            Assignee: Patrick Hunt
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 3.3.6, 3.4.4, 3.5.0
>
>         Attachments: TruncateTxLogCorruption.tgz
>
>
> The truncate method on the transaction log in the class 
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.persistence.FileTxnLog will reduce the file size 
> to the required amount without either closing or re-positioning the logStream 
> (which could also be dangerous since the truncate method is not synchronized 
> against concurrent writes to the log).
> This causes the next append to that log to create a small "hole" in the file 
> which java would interpret as binary zeroes when reading it. This then causes 
> to the FileTxnIterator.next() implementation to detect the end of the log 
> file too early.
> I'll attach a small maven project with one junit test which can be used to 
> reproduce the issue. Due to the blackbox nature of the test it will run for 
> roughly 50 seconds unfortunately. 
> Steps to reproduce:
> - Start an ensemble of zookeeper servers with at least 3 participants
> - Create one entry and the remove one of the servers from the ensemble 
> temporarily (e.g. zk-2)
> - Create another entry which is hence only reflected on zk-1 and zk-3
> - Take zk-1 out of the ensemble without shutting it down (that is important, 
> I did that by interrupting the network connection to that node) and clean zk-3
> - Bring back zk-2 and zk-3 so that they form a quorum
> - Allow zk-1 to connect again
> - zk-1 will receive a TRUNC message from zk-2 since zk-1 is now a minority 
> knowing about that second node creation event
> - Create a third node
> - Force zk-1 to become master somehow
> - That third node will be gone

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to