Sounds like great stuff, Andrei. Do you have a description of the faults you have injected I can access?
-Flavio On Jul 2, 2012, at 10:14 PM, Andrei Savu wrote: > I was unable to find any issues so far. It seems like ZooKeeper does a > great job at > handling network failures. > > This tool is deploying a ZooKeeper cluster on a cloud provider using Whirr > together > with Byteman [1] (attached to the JVM). > > Faults are injected by using Byteman rules. See this tutorial: > https://community.jboss.org/wiki/FaultInjectionTestingWithByteman#what_is_fault_injection_testing > > I am planning to improve the tool to have the ability o inject arbitrary > rules through the web UI. > > As an workload generator I am using a distributed queue implementation > that's handling > ConnectionLoss by retrying to post the message (duplicates are acceptable > when measuring the latency). > > [1] http://www.jboss.org/byteman/ > > -- Andrei Savu > > On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Sounds interesting but it's not clear to me from the provided docs >> what it does and what am I expected to do? (canned tests or a >> framework for me to use). Have you been able to find any issues using >> this? >> >> Patrick >> >> On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:15 AM, Andrei Savu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> As part of my MSc. project I have spent some time working on a tool for >>> fault injection testing for Apache ZooKeeper based on jboss Byteman and >>> Apache Whirr. >>> >>> You can find the code on Github: >>> >>> https://github.com/andreisavu/zookeeper-tester >>> >>> Do you think this can be an useful addition to contrib? (a version >> that's a >>> bit more generic) >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> -- Andrei Savu / axemblr.com / Tools for Clouds >>
