[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13487332#comment-13487332
 ] 

Skye Wanderman-Milne commented on ZOOKEEPER-1560:
-------------------------------------------------

Rather than checking if the xid is 0, the new patch moves the xid code into the 
if (p.bb == null) block. We're essentially checking whether we've already 
started writing the packet, and if we haven't, we call createBB and setXid. 
Since we always do these two actions under the same condition (i.e., when we 
see a new packet), there's no reason to have two separate checks.
                
> Zookeeper client hangs on creation of large nodes
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-1560
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1560
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: java client
>    Affects Versions: 3.4.4, 3.5.0
>            Reporter: Igor Motov
>            Assignee: Skye Wanderman-Milne
>             Fix For: 3.5.0, 3.4.5
>
>         Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-1560.patch, zookeeper-1560-v1.txt, 
> zookeeper-1560-v2.txt, zookeeper-1560-v3.txt, zookeeper-1560-v4.txt, 
> zookeeper-1560-v5.txt, zookeeper-1560-v6.txt, zookeeper-1560-v7.txt, 
> ZOOKEEPER-1560-v8.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1560-v8_r3.patch
>
>
> To reproduce, try creating a node with 0.5M of data using java client. The 
> test will hang waiting for a response from the server. See the attached patch 
> for the test that reproduces the issue.
> It seems that ZOOKEEPER-1437 introduced a few issues to 
> {{ClientCnxnSocketNIO.doIO}} that prevent {{ClientCnxnSocketNIO}} from 
> sending large packets that require several invocations of 
> {{SocketChannel.write}} to complete. The first issue is that the call to 
> {{outgoingQueue.removeFirstOccurrence(p);}} removes the packet from the queue 
> even if the packet wasn't completely sent yet.  It looks to me that this call 
> should be moved under {{if (!pbb.hasRemaining())}} The second issue is that 
> {{p.createBB()}} is reinitializing {{ByteBuffer}} on every iteration, which 
> confuses {{SocketChannel.write}}. And the third issue is caused by extra 
> calls to {{cnxn.getXid()}} that increment xid on every iteration and confuse 
> the server.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to