[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1643?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13576008#comment-13576008
 ] 

Michi Mutsuzaki commented on ZOOKEEPER-1643:
--------------------------------------------

I didn't write the code, but I agree with Erik and Ben.

- For windows, we should use InterlockedExchangeAdd.
- For non-windows, we should use  __sync_fetch_and_ad

Erik, would you be interested in providing a patch?

Thanks!
--Michi
                
> Windows: fetch_and_add not 64bit-compatible, may not be correct
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-1643
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1643
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: c client
>    Affects Versions: 3.3.3
>         Environment: Windows 7
> Microsoft Visual Studio 2005
>            Reporter: Erik Anderson
>
> Note: While I am using a really old version of ZK, I did do enough "SVN 
> Blame" operations to realize that this code hasn't changed.
> I am currently attempting to compile the C client under MSVC 2005 arch=x64.  
> There are three things I can see with fetch_and_add() inside of 
> /src/c/src/mt_adapter.c
> (1) MSVC 2005 64bit will not compile inline _asm sections.  I'm moderately 
> sure this code is x86-specific so I'm unsure whether it should attempt to 
> either.
> (2) The Windows intrinsic InterlockedExchangeAdd 
> [http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms683597(v=vs.85).aspx]
>  appears to do the same thing this code is attempting to do
> (3) I'm really rusty on my assembly, but why are we doing two separate XADD 
> operations here, and is the code as-written anything approaching atomicity?
> If you want an official patch I likely can do an SVN checkout and submit a 
> patch the replaces the entire #else on lines 495-505 with a "return 
> InterlockedExchangeAdd(operand, incr);"
> Usually when I'm scratching my head this badly there's something I'm missing 
> though.  As far as I can tell there has been no prior discussion on this code.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to