[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13965613#comment-13965613
 ] 

Michi Mutsuzaki commented on ZOOKEEPER-1881:
--------------------------------------------

Hi Ding,

You need to click on the "Submit Patch" button above to indicate that the patch 
is ready for review.

> Shutdown server immediately upon PrivilegedActionException
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-1881
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1881
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: server
>    Affects Versions: 3.4.5
>            Reporter: Ding Yuan
>             Fix For: 3.5.0
>
>         Attachments: zookeeper-1881.patch
>
>
> It seems when an SaslServer cannot be created due to a 
> PriviledgedActionException, it is better to shutdown the server immediately 
> instead of letting it to propagate. The current behaviour will just set 
> ServerCncx.zooKeeperSaslServer to null, and later every time when an SASL 
> request comes in it will be rejected. If we already detect the loophole 
> early, we should just reject it early.
> {noformat}
> private SaslServer createSaslServer(final Login login) {
>     catch (PrivilegedActionException e) {
>         // TODO: exit server at this point(?)
>         LOG.error("Zookeeper Quorum member experienced a 
> PrivilegedActionException exception while creating a SaslServer using a JAAS 
> principal context:" + e);
>         e.printStackTrace();
>     }
> {noformat}
> For what it is worth, attaching an attempt to patch it. The idea of the patch 
> is to propagate this PrivilegedActionException to ServerCnxnFactory and shut 
> down all the connections and server. Not sure if this is the right way to 
> solve it. Any comments are appreciated!
> Also in the patch are two additional logging on two unlogged exceptions.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to