[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14059162#comment-14059162 ]
Raul Gutierrez Segales commented on ZOOKEEPER-1346: --------------------------------------------------- Added some more comments on the reviewboard, mainly questions about diverging impls in the Netty vs NIO ServerCnxnFactory and smaller nits. Oh, and one more case in which I think a well defined defined class is better than Map<> for returning values. After that I am happy to +1 this. Thanks [~bhavanki]! > Handle 4lws and monitoring on separate port > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: ZOOKEEPER-1346 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1346 > Project: ZooKeeper > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: server > Reporter: Camille Fournier > Assignee: Bill Havanki > Fix For: 3.5.0 > > Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-1346.2.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1346.3.patch, > ZOOKEEPER-1346.4.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1346.6.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1346.7.patch, > ZOOKEEPER-1346.8.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1346.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1346_jetty.patch > > > Move the 4lws to their own port, off of the client port, and support them > properly via long-lived sessions instead of polling. Deprecate the 4lw > support on the client port. Will enable us to enhance the functionality of > the commands via extended command syntax, address security concerns and fix > bugs involving the socket close being received before all of the data on the > client end. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)