Hi Guys, Sorry for not making more progress on ZK-1807. I support Raul's proposal - how about getting the last patch in - the code change basically reverts to what was there before ZK-107 changes, so solves the observer spamming. Besides that it adds two more tests for reconfiguration. We can keep the JIRA open.
Alex On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <[email protected] > wrote: > On 14 July 2014 19:36, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Update: we're back to 8 blockers on 3.5.0 (not clear to me which > > one(s?) is new?) > > > > Looks like the autoconf issue I reported is hitting the upgraded > > apache jenkins instances as well. I've updated the "archive" list to > > include the c tests stdout redirect. So while it won't go to console > > at least we can debug when there is a failure. > > > > Raul has been helping Bill with reviews for the jetty server support > > and it looks like that should be ready soon. > > > > Raul also requested that someone prioritize reviewing "ZOOKEEPER-1919 > > Update the C implementation of removeWatches to have it match > > ZOOKEEPER-1910" so that we can include it in 3.5.0. Flavio/Michi? > > > > Hongchao got a patch in to cleanup the flakey c client reconfig test - > > kudos on helping cleanup the build/test infra! > > > > > > Based on previous comments it looks like we're pretty close. Do folks > > feel comfortable with a 3.5.0 alpha at this point? (with a few pending > > as above) > > > > +1, though it would be really nice to have the proposed patch for > ZOOKEEPER-1807 merged since otherwise I'll need to apply patches to the > alpha release to be able to test it in my environment (with many > observers). > > > Cheers, > -rgs >
