[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14110078#comment-14110078
 ] 

Alexander Shraer commented on ZOOKEEPER-2016:
---------------------------------------------

But only one of the clients invokes reconfig, so your solution will take care 
of this guy, sure, but what happens with all the other clients ? what will 
cause them to invoke updateServerList ?

To your question - the completion of reconfig is similar to the completion of 
setData - the commit reached the server that responds to the client, and also 
the leader of course since it sends the commit, but potentially no other server 
(yet). 

> Automate client-side rebalancing
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-2016
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2016
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Hongchao Deng
>         Attachments: draft.patch
>
>
> ZOOKEEPER-1355 introduced client-side rebalancing, which is implemented in 
> both the C and Java client libraries. However, it requires the client to 
> detect a configuration change and call updateServerList with the new 
> connection string (see reconfig manual). It may be better if the client just 
> indicates that he is interested in this feature when creating a ZK handle and 
> we'll detect configuration changes and invoke updateServerList for him 
> underneath the hood.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to