[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14119077#comment-14119077
]
Hongchao Deng commented on ZOOKEEPER-2024:
------------------------------------------
Okay. I am feeling more clear what I wanna say. Let me summarize it.
h3. Stalling
I totally agree that unaffected requests should not block each other. But this
seems to be specific user activity optimizations. Even if user doesn't wanna
handle it, we can still handle in client code. So why do buffering on server
side. The server approach means more workload on server side and limits
scalability.
h3. Starvation
I think it's good to provide options to enable read or write preferred ordering
with a default one being sequential (no preference).
Since this is [~kfirlevari] proposal, could you clarify the tradeoff /
motivation to push it on server side? And welcome to ask me questions if
anything confusing I made.
> Major throughput improvement with mixed workloads
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-2024
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2024
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: quorum, server
> Reporter: Kfir Lev-Ari
> Assignee: Kfir Lev-Ari
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-2024.patch
>
>
> The patch is applied to the commit processor, and solves two problems:
> 1. Stalling - once the commit processor encounters a local write request, it
> stalls local processing of all sessions until it receives a commit of that
> request from the leader.
> In mixed workloads, this severely hampers performance as it does not allow
> read-only sessions to proceed at faster speed than read-write ones.
> 2. Starvation - as long as there are read requests to process, older remote
> committed write requests are starved.
> This occurs due to a bug fix
> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1505) that forces processing
> of local read requests before handling any committed write. The problem is
> only manifested under high local read load.
> Our solution solves these two problems. It improves throughput in mixed
> workloads (in our tests, by up to 8x), and reduces latency, especially higher
> percentiles (i.e., slowest requests).
> The main idea is to separate sessions that inherently need to stall in order
> to enforce order semantics, from ones that do not need to stall. To this end,
> we add data structures for buffering and managing pending requests of stalled
> sessions; these requests are moved out of the critical path to these data
> structures, allowing continued processing of unaffected sessions.
> In order to avoid starvation, our solution prioritizes committed write
> requests over reads, and enforces fairness among read requests of sessions.
> Please see the docs:
> 1)
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oXJiSt9VqL35hCYQRmFuC63ETd0F_g6uApzocgkFe3Y/edit?usp=sharing
> - includes a detailed description of the new commit processor algorithm.
> 2) The attached patch implements our solution, and a collection of related
> unit tests (https://reviews.apache.org/r/25160)
> 3)
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1vmdfsq4WLr92BQO-CGcualE0KhAtjIu3bCaVwYajLo8/edit?usp=sharing
> - shows performance results of running system tests on the patched ZK using
> the patched system test from
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2023.
> See also https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1609
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
