> On Dec. 2, 2014, 11:43 p.m., fpj wrote:
> > src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/ClientCnxnSocketNetty.java, line 66
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/27244/diff/22/?file=774526#file774526line66>
> >
> >     Is the reason to have workSemaphore to block in doTransport when there 
> > isn't anything in the outgoing queue? If so, we might be better off with a 
> > blocking queue rather than a list as we have right now.

Sounds good on my side. I tried to make minimal changes. Do you think I should 
make it in here or create another JIRA?


> On Dec. 2, 2014, 11:43 p.m., fpj wrote:
> > src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/ClientCnxnSocketNetty.java, line 107
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/27244/diff/22/?file=774526#file774526line107>
> >
> >     I'm not sure why you're not using the ChannelFuture returned here. See 
> > this connect() method in bookkeeper for an example 
> > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/blob/branch-4.0/bookkeeper-server/src/main/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/proto/PerChannelBookieClient.java#L112

Good. Fix it next


> On Dec. 2, 2014, 11:43 p.m., fpj wrote:
> > src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/ClientCnxnSocketNetty.java, line 188
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/27244/diff/22/?file=774526#file774526line188>
> >
> >     Could you elaborate on what you're trying to do with this NIOLock? I'm 
> > not sure what you mean with race cocnditions in the comment.

1. The intuition is that in NIO client all reads and writes are sequential.
2. One problem I found: (1) packet is removed from outgoingQueue; (2) before 
the packet is added to pendingQueue; (3) sendThread.readResponse throws 
exception.
3. I am wondering what the purpose of pendingQueue is except for checking and 
if we can remove it. AFAICT that's the only concurrency concern.


- Hongchao


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27244/#review63604
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 24, 2014, 7:01 p.m., Hongchao Deng wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/27244/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 24, 2014, 7:01 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for zookeeper.
> 
> 
> Repository: zookeeper-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> ZOOKEEPER-2069
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/ClientCnxn.java b4ece07 
>   src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/ClientCnxnSocket.java 5ca0ba7 
>   src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/ClientCnxnSocketNIO.java adb27ee 
>   src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/ClientCnxnSocketNetty.java PRE-CREATION 
>   src/java/test/org/apache/zookeeper/test/NettyNettySuiteBase.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   src/java/test/org/apache/zookeeper/test/NettyNettySuiteHammerTest.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   src/java/test/org/apache/zookeeper/test/NettyNettySuiteTest.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27244/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Hongchao Deng
> 
>

Reply via email to