[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14558698#comment-14558698
 ] 

Ziyou Wang commented on ZOOKEEPER-2172:
---------------------------------------

Yes, it has the same problem.

The step is:
1. Start server 1, its zoo.cfg contains:
standaloneEnabled=false
syncLimit=2
tickTime=2000
initLimit=5

ant its dynamic config file just contains itself.

2. Start server 2, its zoo.cfg is the same and its init dynamic config file 
contains 1 and itself. Then reconfig itself as a participant after it sync data 
from 1 (need to try a few time until the reconfig can be finished).

3. Start server 3, use the same zoo.cfg and its init dynamic config file 
contains 1, 2 and itself. Then reconfig itself as the third participant (where 
we hit the bug).

Since it is a race condition, it may be not easy to be reproduced in your 
environment. In my dev, the zk server is running in a docker-in-VM 
environment. If I change the script to just wait 5 secs after starting the 
server 3, the problem can be reproduced every time. 

> Cluster crashes when reconfig a new node as a participant
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-2172
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2172
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: leaderElection, quorum, server
>    Affects Versions: 3.5.0
>         Environment: Ubuntu 12.04 + java 7
>            Reporter: Ziyou Wang
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: node-1.log, node-2.log, node-3.log, 
> zoo.cfg.dynamic.10000005d, zoo.cfg.dynamic.next, zookeeper-1.log, 
> zookeeper-2.log, zookeeper-3.log
>
>
> The operations are quite simple: start three zk servers one by one, then 
> reconfig the cluster to add the new one as a participant. When I add the  
> third one, the zk cluster may enter a weird state and cannot recover.
>  
>       I found “2015-04-20 12:53:48,236 [myid:1] - INFO  [ProcessThread(sid:1 
> cport:-1)::PrepRequestProcessor@547] - Incremental reconfig” in node-1 log. 
> So the first node received the reconfig cmd at 12:53:48. Latter, it logged 
> “2015-04-20  12:53:52,230 [myid:1] - ERROR 
> [LearnerHandler-/10.0.0.2:55890:LearnerHandler@580] - Unexpected exception 
> causing shutdown while sock still open” and “2015-04-20 12:53:52,231 [myid:1] 
> - WARN  [LearnerHandler-/10.0.0.2:55890:LearnerHandler@595] - ******* GOODBYE 
>  /10.0.0.2:55890 ********”. From then on, the first node and second node 
> rejected all client connections and the third node didn’t join the cluster as 
> a participant. The whole cluster was done.
>  
>      When the problem happened, all three nodes just used the same dynamic 
> config file zoo.cfg.dynamic.10000005d which only contained the first two 
> nodes. But there was another unused dynamic config file in node-1 directory 
> zoo.cfg.dynamic.next  which already contained three nodes.
>  
>      When I extended the waiting time between starting the third node and 
> reconfiguring the cluster, the problem didn’t show again. So it should be a 
> race condition problem.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to