[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14973120#comment-14973120
]
Arshad Mohammad commented on ZOOKEEPER-2299:
--------------------------------------------
Thanks [~eribeiro] for your review comments.
# In the test case I am testing the complete ClientAddress feature, all three
scenarios are tested. If I go for the naming convention you are suggesting I
have to split the test case into three which will take more when executed.
# In my previous patch [~rgs] suggested to have smaller test case name.
[Comment |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2269?focusedCommentId=14738160&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14738160]
So not changing the test case name.
> NullPointerException in LocalPeerBean for ClientAddress
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-2299
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2299
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: jmx
> Reporter: Arshad Mohammad
> Assignee: Arshad Mohammad
> Fix For: 3.5.2
>
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-2299-01.patch
>
>
> When clientPortAddress is not configured LocalPeerBean throws
> NullPointerException.
> *Expected Behavior:*
> # When only clientPort is configured ClientAddress value should be
> 0.0.0.0:clientPort or 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:clientPort
> # When both clientPort clientPortAddress are configured then expected value
> is clientPortAddress:clientPort
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
