[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15046934#comment-15046934
]
Rakesh R commented on ZOOKEEPER-1045:
-------------------------------------
Thanks everyone for the interests and useful discussions. I agree with [~fpj]
to make a clear distinction between the two jira issues. I could see the idea
of this jira is to provide an authentication mechanism among the quorum peers
using SASL. I'm currently working on SASL + Kerberos based solution in
branch-3.4. I'm assigning the issue to myself and will upload a patch soon.
Thank you [~geek101] for the efforts in building SSL way, we could use
ZOOKEEPER-1000 for this solution. My personal opinion is to implement SSL
solution in 3.5.* or trunk as Netty + SSL feature for the client-server
communication is available from branch-3.5 onwards.
> Quorum Peer mutual authentication
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-1045
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1045
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: server
> Reporter: Eugene Koontz
>
> ZOOKEEPER-938 addresses mutual authentication between clients and servers.
> This bug, on the other hand, is for authentication among quorum peers.
> Hopefully much of the work done on SASL integration with Zookeeper for
> ZOOKEEPER-938 can be used as a foundation for this enhancement.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
