[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15133993#comment-15133993
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-954:
-------------------------------------

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12786453/ZOOKEEPER-954-V2.patch
  against trunk revision 1728577.

    +1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    -1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
                        Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
                        Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

    +1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

    +1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

    +1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 2.0.3) 
warnings.

    +1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

    -1 core tests.  The patch failed core unit tests.

    +1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/3035//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/3035//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/3035//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Findbugs/ClientCnxn: Bug type JLM_JSR166_UTILCONCURRENT_MONITORENTER
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-954
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-954
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: java client
>            Reporter: Thomas Koch
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-954-V2.patch, ZOOKEEPER-954.patch
>
>
> JLM   Synchronization performed on java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue 
> in org.apache.zookeeper.ClientCnxn$EventThread.queuePacket(ClientCnxn$Packet)
>       
> Bug type JLM_JSR166_UTILCONCURRENT_MONITORENTER (click for details)
> In class org.apache.zookeeper.ClientCnxn$EventThread
> In method 
> org.apache.zookeeper.ClientCnxn$EventThread.queuePacket(ClientCnxn$Packet)
> Type java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue
> Value loaded from field 
> org.apache.zookeeper.ClientCnxn$EventThread.waitingEvents
> At ClientCnxn.java:[line 411]
> JLM   Synchronization performed on java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue 
> in org.apache.zookeeper.ClientCnxn$EventThread.run()
>       
> Bug type JLM_JSR166_UTILCONCURRENT_MONITORENTER (click for details)
> In class org.apache.zookeeper.ClientCnxn$EventThread
> In method org.apache.zookeeper.ClientCnxn$EventThread.run()
> Type java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue
> Value loaded from field 
> org.apache.zookeeper.ClientCnxn$EventThread.waitingEvents
> At ClientCnxn.java:[line 436]
> The respective code:
> 409          public void queuePacket(Packet packet) {
> 410             if (wasKilled) {
> 411                synchronized (waitingEvents) {
> 412                   if (isRunning) waitingEvents.add(packet);
> 413                   else processEvent(packet);
> 414                }
> 415             } else {
> 416                waitingEvents.add(packet);
> 417             }
> 418          }
> 419   
> 420           public void queueEventOfDeath() {
> 421               waitingEvents.add(eventOfDeath);
> 422           }
> 423   
> 424           @Override
> 425           public void run() {
> 426              try {
> 427                 isRunning = true;
> 428                 while (true) {
> 429                    Object event = waitingEvents.take();
> 430                    if (event == eventOfDeath) {
> 431                       wasKilled = true;
> 432                    } else {
> 433                       processEvent(event);
> 434                    }
> 435                    if (wasKilled)
> 436                       synchronized (waitingEvents) {
> 437                          if (waitingEvents.isEmpty()) {
> 438                             isRunning = false;
> 439                             break;
> 440                          }
> 441                       }
> 442                 }



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to