Thanks Raul, +1(non-binding).

- Built and ran tests successfully in CentOS Linux 7.0.1406
- Ran few zkcli commands, four letter words
- Tested against Hadoop-2.7.2,  small 3 node cluster
- Reviewed release note

Regards,
Rakesh

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1
>
> - Verified checksums and sig
> - Licensing looks good (though there are jars without attribution in
> contrib/, but this isn't anything new)
> - ant test ran cleanly
> - Ran client and server code through our CI. Nothing broke.
> - ant releaseaudit ran cleanly
>
> Good work Raul!
>
> -Ivan
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 3:35 AM, Michi Mutsuzaki <mutsuz...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > - Verified the checksums and the signature.
> > - Reviewed the release note.
> > - Ran 'ant test' on ubuntu 14.04.
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Cameron McKenzie
> > <cammcken...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> +1 (non binding)
> >>
> >> Have built ZK 3.4.8 RC0 from source and tested that ZOOKEEPER-706 is
> fixed.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Jerry He <jerry...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I have built the Zookeeper 3.4.8 RC0 from the source,
> >>> updated the HBase 1.2.0RC3 (HBase latest release RC) pom to use the new
> >>> zookeeper version,
> >>> built HBase and ran HBase mvn test suite twice. All are successful.
> >>>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> Jerry
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 7:17 AM, Flavio P JUNQUEIRA <f...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > I wanted to add that it is very important that all users test the
> release
> >>> > candidate, not only committers or PMC members.  That's the way to
> gain
> >>> > confidence that the RC is good for everyone.
> >>> >
> >>> > If you have a chance to check it out, especially if you have an app
> to
> >>> test
> >>> > it against, please do it this week. The community appreciates it.
> >>> >
> >>> > -Flavio
> >>> > On 16 Feb 2016 4:20 am, "Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés" <
> r...@itevenworks.net>
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > Hi,
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Quick reminder that the vote closes up on the 20th, it would be
> great
> >>> to
> >>> > > have more votes and feedback this week. Thanks!
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > -rgs
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On 5 February 2016 at 20:00, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <
> >>> r...@itevenworks.net
> >>> > >
> >>> > > wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > > This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.4.8. It fixes 9 issues,
> most
> >>> > > > notably a deadlock when shutting down ZooKeeper.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > The full release notes is available at:
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310801&version=12326517
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > *** Please download, test and vote by February 20th 2016, 23:59
> >>> UTC+0.
> >>> > > ***
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Source files:
> >>> > > > http://people.apache.org/~rgs/zookeeper-3-4-8-rc0/
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Maven staging repo:
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/zookeeper/zookeeper/3.4.8/
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > The tag to be voted upon:
> >>> > > >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/tags/release-3.4.8-rc0
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > ZooKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> release:
> >>> > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/zookeeper/KEYS
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Should we release this candidate?
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Note that the approval is by lazy majority according to the
> bylaws
> >>> and
> >>> > > > only PMC votes are binding.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > -rgs
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
>

Reply via email to