[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jordan Zimmerman updated ZOOKEEPER-2169:
----------------------------------------
    Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-2169.patch

This patch takes advantage of 3.5's container support. Most of the work needed 
to support TTLs is there already. 

* In order not to break on-disk and protocol compatibility the ephemeralOwner 
is yet-again overloaded to have special meaning. 
* New opcodes and transaction records had to be added in a similar manner to 
Containers
* More tests are needed

> Enable creation of nodes with TTLs
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-2169
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2169
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: c client, java client, jute, server
>    Affects Versions: 3.6.0
>            Reporter: Camille Fournier
>            Assignee: Jordan Zimmerman
>             Fix For: 3.6.0
>
>         Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-2169.patch
>
>
> As a user, I would like to be able to create a node that is NOT tied to a 
> session but that WILL expire automatically if action is not taken by some 
> client within a time window.
> I propose this to enable clients interacting with ZK via http or other "thin 
> clients" to create ephemeral-like nodes.
> Some ideas for the design, up for discussion:
> The node should support all normal ZK node operations including ACLs, 
> sequential key generation, etc, however, it should not support the ephemeral 
> flag. The node will be created with a TTL that is updated via a refresh 
> operation. 
> The ZK quorum will watch this node similarly to the way that it watches for 
> session liveness; if the node is not refreshed within the TTL, it will expire.
> QUESTIONS:
> 1) Should we let the refresh operation set the TTL to a different base value?
> 2) If so, should the setting of the TTL to a new base value cause a watch to 
> fire?
> 3) Do we want to allow these nodes to have children or prevent this similar 
> to ephemeral nodes?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to