Sound good to me This is the jira issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2460
Thank you - Enrico 2016-06-30 9:31 GMT+02:00 Flavio Junqueira <[email protected]>: > Agreed, I don't think it is a block either. We are more sensitive to > licensing issues, so that's why we had to stop the RC. > > Please feel free to create a jira so that we do it for the following release, > Enrico. > > -Flavio > >> On 30 Jun 2016, at 06:58, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Enrico, I don't believe this would be a blocker for the 3.5.2 release >> (correct me if I missed something). Certainly we should fix it, but not a >> blocker imo. >> >> Patrick >> >> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> There is also the javacc dep to be removed if it is possible. I don't know >>> if I have time today in order to submit a patch >>> >>> Enrico >>> >>> Il Gio 30 Giu 2016 06:19 Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> ha scritto: >>> >>>> I've committed 2458 and 2459 to 3.5 and trunk branches if you want to cut >>>> another RC. These two patches addressed the concerns raised by Flavio. >>>> >>>> Patrick >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Flavio Junqueira <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> -1, In the last update of ZK-2235, we didn't remove >>>>> servlet-api-2.5.LICENSE.txt, so the licensing information is incorrect. >>>>> I'll submit a patch shortly. >>>>> >>>>> Since we are on the topic, I'm wondering if we need to bubble up the >>>>> contents of the netty notice file as well that comes in the jar. >>> Before I >>>>> thought that it wasn't necessary as long as the NOTICE is there with >>> the >>>>> jar, but then someone in the incubator list called the attention to the >>>>> fact that we needed to bubble up some info in the notice file. The >>>>> instructions I'm aware of aren't super clear: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep >>>>> >>>>> -Flavio >>>>> >>>>>> On 29 Jun 2016, at 18:34, Mohammad arshad < >>> [email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 (non binding) >>>>>> Built tar on windows >>>>>> Generated docs >>>>>> VERFICATION: >>>>>> Installed 2 cluster each of 3 zk server >>>>>> 1)Tested following scenario for ZOOKEEPER-2139 Multi Client in a JVM >>>>> (with 2 clients from the same jvm) >>>>>> i) One client connected to secure, SSL authentication enabled, >>>>> cluster other to non-secure cluster >>>>>> Both clients were doing create, delete, get data and set data >>>>> simultaneously and continuously >>>>>> ii) One client connected to kerbeors authentication enabled >>>>> cluster other to digest authentication enabled cluster >>>>>> Both clients were doing create, delete, get data and set data >>>>> simultaneously and continuously >>>>>> 2) Following Operations are verified >>>>>> create node (ALL API, All node types) >>>>>> delete node >>>>>> set data >>>>>> get data >>>>>> setAcl >>>>>> getAcl >>>>>> multi operation >>>>>> Few Four letter word commands >>>>>> 3) Verified all the JIRA in which I was involved, all are passed >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Arshad >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Patrick Hunt [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>> Sent: 29 June 2016 20:47 >>>>>> To: DevZooKeeper >>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.2-alpha candidate 0 >>>>>> >>>>>> Looks like that javacc dependency was added in >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-96 and should have >>>> been >>>>> build only afaict. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for reporting this Enrico, would you mind submitting a JIRA >>> (and >>>>> perhaps a patch)? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> Patrick >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 8:10 AM, Enrico Olivelli < >>> [email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 (non binding) >>>>>>> Tested Majordodo (http://majordodo.org) and BlazingCache >>>>>>> (http://blazingcache.org) against 3.5.2-alpha. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My tests also include running Apache BookKeeper 4.4.0 using the >>>>>>> 3.5.2-alpha java client. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> All is fine but dependencies changed a lot, many legacy deps like >>>>>>> jline, jms and sun jmx disappeared and this is very good, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> but this new dependency showed up: >>>>>>> net.java.dev.javacc:javacc:jar:5.0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If I exclude javacc all of my tests continue to run fine, my tests >>>>>>> cover both java client and embedded single server. >>>>>>> Maybe it would be useful to hide the dependency in future release >>> but >>>>>>> it is not a showstopper for my projects. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2016-06-28 19:52 GMT+02:00 Abraham Fine <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>> +1 tested SSL support, everything appears to be working as >>> expected. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016, at 03:19 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: >>>>>>>>> +1. sig/xsum are valid, RAT ran clean and no other discrepancies >>>>>>> noticed. >>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>> ran it through a number of manual tests (including starting a 23 >>>>>>>>> server >>>>>>>>> ensemble) - no issues found. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Patrick >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Chris Nauroth >>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> This is a release candidate for 3.5.2-alpha. The full release >>>>>>>>>> notes >>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>>> available at: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310 >>>>>>> 801&v >>>>>>>>>> ersion=12331981 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *** Please download, test and vote by July 1st 2016, 23:59 UTC+0. >>>>>>>>>> *** >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Source files: >>>>>>>>>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~cnauroth/zookeeper-3.5.2-alpha-candidat >>>>>>>>>> e-0/ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Maven staging repo: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/zookee >>>>>>> per/z >>>>>>>>>> ookeeper/3.5.2-alpha/ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The tag to be voted upon: >>>>>>>>>> >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/tags/release-3.5.2-rc0 >>>>>>>>>> / >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ZooKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the >>>> release: >>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/zookeeper/KEYS >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Should we release this candidate? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> --Chris Nauroth >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> -- Enrico Olivelli >>> >
