Hi All, (1) ZK-2383 -> Attached patch and the bug reporter has shown interests to review/test the available patch. @Flavio, @Patrick, do you have some cycles to review the proposed patch. Welcome others input as well. Thanks!
(2) I believe we are very close to finish ZK-2247, waiting for the final reviews and commit. (3) I'd love to include ZK-2355 also. It looks like the fix is good, I've added few comments. Perhaps, will wait to see feedback from others. Kindly requesting everyone to look at your issues marked for 3.4.9 and push these asap or can be pushed out to 3.4.10. Thanks, Rakesh On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan > <rake...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > >>>>>ZK-1045 is a major change and I suggest we give time for folks to > try > > it out before cutting a release candidate. Ideally, we check it in and > give > > a few weeks until we cut a release candidate. > > > > Agreed, will try to push ZK-1045 in asap. Michael and myself is working > > closely to finish the following set of open points. Hopefully by next > week > > we will be able to complete the identified tasks, then will post updated > > patch and test report. I would appreciate review > > comments/questions/feedback from others. > > > > I am taking another pass at this next. > > > Pending tasks:- > > 1) support authorization in sasl. > > 2) few minor log improvements are open. > > 3) system testing and preparing report. > > 4) feature document with latest changes. > > > > > > >>>>>The other one, ZK-2383, needs work. > > > > Here, I'm planning to revert ZOOKEEPER-2026 committed code and makes this > > issue open for discussion/fix. Does it sound good? > > > > Given 2026 is already shipping I would be concerned about reverting it > at this point. Why wouldn't we just fix the remaining issue(s)? > > Patrick > > > Thanks, > > Rakesh > > > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > Thanks for bootstrapping the release process for 3.4.9. ZK-1045 is a > major > > > change and I suggest we give time for folks to try it out before > cutting a > > > release candidate. Ideally, we check it in and give a few weeks until > we > > > cut a release candidate. > > > > > > One of the blockers, ZK-2314 has only one remaining task which is to > > > document missing SASL properties, so that should be easy. The other > one, > > > ZK-2383, needs work. > > > > > > Folks should check the remaining issues to determine if there is any > other > > > blocker that we missed in that list. > > > > > > -Flavio > > > > > > > On 07 Jul 2016, at 05:12, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rake...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > I am interested in going through the release process as the RM. > > > > > > > > I could see total 23 issues marked for 3.4.9 release as of now, which > > > > includes 2 blockers, 6 critical, 12 major and 3 minor issues. I > count 15 > > > > issues fixed/committed already for 3.4.9 which includes 6 blockers > and 2 > > > > critical(security related) issues. I think it is a good time to > initiate > > > > the discussion of 3.4.9 release processes. > > > > > > > > Please find the open issues here, https://goo.gl/SEliwm > > > > > > > > Currently, I'm focusing on ZOOKEEPER-1045 sasl feature which I think > is > > > > much appreciated/awaited feature and I'd like to include this if > everyone > > > > agrees. Appreciate help in reviewing/testing the patch and making it > > > stable > > > > for release. Also, please feel free to push your favorite issues > ahead of > > > > 3.4.9 release. > > > > > > > > I hope we should be able to close all blockers and critical issues > in a > > > > month. Kindly requesting everyone to look at the issues marked for > 3.4.9 > > > > and push these asap or can be pushed out to 3.4.10. I will focus my > code > > > > review time on these. > > > > > > > > Please let me know your thoughts on the plan. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Rakesh > > > > > > >
