Github user lvfangmin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/117#discussion_r90368114
--- Diff:
src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/persistence/FileTxnSnapLog.java ---
@@ -165,8 +165,22 @@ public File getSnapDir() {
*/
public long restore(DataTree dt, Map<Long, Integer> sessions,
PlayBackListener listener) throws IOException {
- snapLog.deserialize(dt, sessions);
+ long deserializeResult = snapLog.deserialize(dt, sessions);
FileTxnLog txnLog = new FileTxnLog(dataDir);
+ if (-1L == deserializeResult) {
+ /* this means that we couldn't find any snapshot, so we need to
+ * initialize an empty database */
+ if (txnLog.getLastLoggedZxid() != -1) {
+ throw new IOException(
+ "No snapshot found, but there are log entries. " +
+ "Something is broken!");
+ }
+ /* TODO: (br33d) we should either put a ConcurrentHashMap on
restore()
+ * or use Map on save() */
+ save(dt, (ConcurrentHashMap<Long, Integer>)sessions);
--- End diff --
n00b question, why we need to save here? I saw there is potential that the
follower will sync with with leader just to send over the empty snapshot.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
