[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15778863#comment-15778863
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on ZOOKEEPER-1416:
-------------------------------------------

GitHub user Randgalt opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/136

    [ZOOKEEPER-1416] Persistent Recursive Watch

    Here is a completed implementation for a persistent, recursive watch 
addition for ZK. These watches are set via a new method, `addPersistentWatch()` 
and are removed via the existing watcher removal methods. Persistent, recursive 
watches have these characteristics:
    
    - Once set, they do not auto-remove when triggered
    - They trigger for all event types (child, data, etc.) on the node they are 
registered for and any child znode recursively.
    - They are efficiently implemented by using the existing watch internals. A 
new class `PathIterator` walks up the path parent-by-parent when checking if a 
watcher applies. 
    
    Persistent watcher specific tests are in `PersistentWatcherTest.java`. I'd 
appreciated feedback on other additional tests that should be added.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/Randgalt/zookeeper ZOOKEEPER-1416

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/136.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #136
    
----
commit 3c05c671d09e5b6df936af8f0a700995d5749e11
Author: randgalt <jor...@jordanzimmerman.com>
Date:   2016-12-25T21:36:13Z

    basic work done. Needs more testing, tuning, etc.

commit ca4a000dcf294aaebd09d3118ebc62cb0783f9cc
Author: randgalt <jor...@jordanzimmerman.com>
Date:   2016-12-26T15:06:55Z

    working on persistent watcher removal

commit bf13deda0b00ca67cd1fa963961d95a22634ed88
Author: randgalt <jor...@jordanzimmerman.com>
Date:   2016-12-26T17:59:04Z

    Support resetting persistent watches

commit 27d8d6cd45cb6adfabf50143f6de62a371447519
Author: randgalt <jor...@jordanzimmerman.com>
Date:   2016-12-26T18:21:17Z

    docs

commit 2766fb1020c600af579a0f701fa3c00ea92b7e22
Author: randgalt <jor...@jordanzimmerman.com>
Date:   2016-12-26T18:44:42Z

    containsWatcher() was broken for STANDARD watchers

commit 86fa1fbcb75021179f80588a2ea46aad2127fb4e
Author: randgalt <jor...@jordanzimmerman.com>
Date:   2016-12-26T19:20:00Z

    removed unused import

commit b490c84d1e56335ba66f9c56d64134886b144451
Author: randgalt <jor...@jordanzimmerman.com>
Date:   2016-12-26T19:20:08Z

    Updated doc for persistent watches

----


> Persistent Recursive Watch
> --------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-1416
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1416
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: c client, documentation, java client, server
>            Reporter: Phillip Liu
>            Assignee: Thawan Kooburat
>   Original Estimate: 504h
>  Remaining Estimate: 504h
>
> h4. The Problem
> A ZooKeeper Watch can be placed on a single znode and when the znode changes 
> a Watch event is sent to the client. If there are thousands of znodes being 
> watched, when a client (re)connect, it would have to send thousands of watch 
> requests. At Facebook, we have this problem storing information for thousands 
> of db shards. Consequently a naming service that consumes the db shard 
> definition issues thousands of watch requests each time the service starts 
> and changes client watcher.
> h4. Proposed Solution
> We add the notion of a Persistent Recursive Watch in ZooKeeper. Persistent 
> means no Watch reset is necessary after a watch-fire. Recursive means the 
> Watch applies to the node and descendant nodes. A Persistent Recursive Watch 
> behaves as follows:
> # Recursive Watch supports all Watch semantics: CHILDREN, DATA, and EXISTS.
> # CHILDREN and DATA Recursive Watches can be placed on any znode.
> # EXISTS Recursive Watches can be placed on any path.
> # A Recursive Watch behaves like a auto-watch registrar on the server side. 
> Setting a  Recursive Watch means to set watches on all descendant znodes.
> # When a watch on a descendant fires, no subsequent event is fired until a 
> corresponding getData(..) on the znode is called, then Recursive Watch 
> automically apply the watch on the znode. This maintains the existing Watch 
> semantic on an individual znode.
> # A Recursive Watch overrides any watches placed on a descendant znode. 
> Practically this means the Recursive Watch Watcher callback is the one 
> receiving the event and event is delivered exactly once.
> A goal here is to reduce the number of semantic changes. The guarantee of no 
> intermediate watch event until data is read will be maintained. The only 
> difference is we will automatically re-add the watch after read. At the same 
> time we add the convience of reducing the need to add multiple watches for 
> sibling znodes and in turn reduce the number of watch messages sent from the 
> client to the server.
> There are some implementation details that needs to be hashed out. Initial 
> thinking is to have the Recursive Watch create per-node watches. This will 
> cause a lot of watches to be created on the server side. Currently, each 
> watch is stored as a single bit in a bit set relative to a session - up to 3 
> bits per client per znode. If there are 100m znodes with 100k clients, each 
> watching all nodes, then this strategy will consume approximately 3.75TB of 
> ram distributed across all Observers. Seems expensive.
> Alternatively, a blacklist of paths to not send Watches regardless of Watch 
> setting can be set each time a watch event from a Recursive Watch is fired. 
> The memory utilization is relative to the number of outstanding reads and at 
> worst case it's 1/3 * 3.75TB using the parameters given above.
> Otherwise, a relaxation of no intermediate watch event until read guarantee 
> is required. If the server can send watch events regardless of one has 
> already been fired without corresponding read, then the server can simply 
> fire watch events without tracking.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to