[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15837645#comment-15837645
]
Edward Ribeiro commented on ZOOKEEPER-2395:
-------------------------------------------
[~hanm], is this issue a duplicate of ZOOKEEPER-2664? I think so, and if I am
right we should close it, right? Do you agree [~phunt]?
> allow ant command line control of junit test jvm args
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-2395
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2395
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: build, tests
> Reporter: Patrick Hunt
> Assignee: Patrick Hunt
> Fix For: 3.4.10, 3.5.3, 3.6.0
>
>
> We're seeing some failing jobs (see below) and the speculation is that it
> might be due to ipv6 vs ipv4 usage. It would be nice to turn on "prefer ipv4"
> in the jvm but there is no easy way to do that. I'll propose that we add a
> variable to ant that's passed through to the jvm.
> ----
> This is very odd. It failed 2 of the last three times it was run on H9
> with the following:
> 2016-03-20 06:06:18,480 [myid:] - INFO
> [main:JUnit4ZKTestRunner$LoggedInvokeMethod@74] - TEST METHOD FAILED
> testBindByAddress
> java.net.SocketException: No such device
> at java.net.NetworkInterface.isLoopback0(Native Method)
> at java.net.NetworkInterface.isLoopback(NetworkInterface.java:339)
> at
> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ClientPortBindTest.testBindByAddress(ClientPortBindTest.java:61)
> https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper_branch34/buildTimeTrend
> Why would it pass one of the times though if there is no loopback
> device on the host? That seems very odd!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
