I don't remember ever agreeing that 3.5 is in beta. If people feel comfortable with that transition I think we should formalize it. See my comment here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15936850#comment-15936850
Patrick On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Liang Han <h...@cloudera.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I noticed that in JIRA the 3.5.3 is still tagged as Alpha [1]. Also this is > mentioned in last board meeting [2] that 3.5.3 will be last Alpha release, > as opposed to a new beta release. > > I thought sometime back we agreed that 3.5.3 would be a beta release, > because we intended to lock the APIs for this release? 3.5.3-beta was > originally mentioned a couple years ago when 3.5 series releases was > planned [3] where the semantic of alpha and beta was also clarified, but I > can't find any traces on why 3.5.3 was named Alpha on JIRA. > > Should we make 3.5.3 another alpha release, or a beta release? > > [1] > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER/?selectedTab > =com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:versions-panel > [2] https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/ZooKeeper.html > [3] > http://markmail.org/message/vnb5pvszgm4cty67#query:+page:1+ > mid:ymxliy2rrwjc2pmo+state:results > > -- > Cheers > Michael. >
