+1, ran tests, checked signature and digests, checked license and notice, ran 
some smoke tests locally.

-Flavio

> On 28 Mar 2017, at 22:44, Michael Han <h...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> 
> Yes, I forgot to mention that I did some backward compatible verification
> as well. I was using 3.4.10 client to connect to a 3.5.3 ensemble and it
> works as expected.
> 
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> fwiw I also tried running a 3 and 23 node cluster and it worked fine. 3.4.9
>> client accessing 3.4.10 rc1 ensemble worked fine as well.
>> 
>> Patrick
>> 
>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> +1 - xsum/sig verified, RAT ran clean, was able to build and run the
>> tests
>>> successfully (mac).
>>> 
>>> Patrick
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <
>> rake...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> This is the second release candidate for 3.4.10. This candidate fixed
>> the
>>>> MiniKDC authentication test case failures reported in the previous
>>>> candidate.
>>>> 
>>>> This is a bug fix release candidate for 3.4.10. It fixes 43 issues,
>>>> including
>>>> security feature QuorumPeer mutual authentication via SASL and other
>>>> potential bugs.
>>>> 
>>>> The full release notes are available at:
>>>> 
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>> ctId=12310801&version=12338036
>>>> 
>>>> *** Please download, test and vote by March 29th 2017, 23:59 UTC+0. ***
>>>> 
>>>> Source files:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~rakeshr/zookeeper-3.4.10-candidate-1/
>>>> 
>>>> Maven staging repo:
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apa
>>>> che/zookeeper/zookeeper/3.4.10/
>>>> 
>>>> The release candidate tag in git to be voted upon: release-3.4.10-rc1
>>>> https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/tree/release-3.4.10-rc1
>>>> 
>>>> ZooKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/zookeeper/KEYS
>>>> 
>>>> Should we release this candidate?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Rakesh
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cheers
> Michael.

Reply via email to