[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16523657#comment-16523657
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-2873:
--------------------------------------

+1 overall.  GitHub Pull Request  Build
      

    +1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    +1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests.

    +1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

    +1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

    +1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 3.0.1) 
warnings.

    +1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

    +1 core tests.  The patch passed core unit tests.

    +1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-github-pr-build/1877//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-github-pr-build/1877//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-github-pr-build/1877//console

This message is automatically generated.

> print error and/or abort on invalid server definition
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-2873
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2873
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: server
>    Affects Versions: 3.4.10
>            Reporter: Christopher Smith
>            Assignee: Norbert Kalmar
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>          Time Spent: 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> While bringing up a new cluster, I managed to fat-finger a sed script and put 
> some lines like this into my config file:
> {code}
> server.1=zookeeper1:2888:2888
> {code}
> This led to a predictable spew of error messages when the client and election 
> components fought over the single port. Since a configuration of this case is 
> *always* an error, I suggest that it would be sensible to abort the server 
> startup if an entry is found with the same port for both client and election. 
> (Logging the error explicitly without shutting down is less helpful because 
> of how fast the logs pile up.)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to