[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16560168#comment-16560168
 ] 

Andor Molnar commented on ZOOKEEPER-3100:
-----------------------------------------

Got it. Sorry, I keep forgetting about this is with embedded ZooKeeper.

> ZooKeeper client times out due to random choice of resolved addresses
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-3100
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3100
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: java client
>    Affects Versions: 3.4.13
>            Reporter: Rajini Sivaram
>            Assignee: Andor Molnar
>            Priority: Major
>
> The changes to ZooKeeper clients to re-resolve hosts made under 
> ZOOKEEPER-2184 results in delays when only a subset of the addresses that a 
> host resolves to are actually reachable. This can result in connection 
> timeouts on the client.
> For example, when running tests with a single ZooKeeper server accepting 
> connections on 127.0.0.1 on a host that has both IPv4 and IPv6, we have seen 
> connection timeouts in tests if client connects using `localhost` rather than 
> `127.0.0.1`. ZooKeeper client resolves `localhost` to both the IPv4 and IPv6 
> addresses and chooses a random one. If IPv6 was chosen, a fixed one second 
> backoff is applied before retry since there is only one hostname specified. 
> After backoff, 'localhost' is resolved again and a random address chosen, 
> which could also be the unconnectable IPv6 address.
> For the list of host names specified for connection, the clients do 
> round-robin without backoffs until connections to all hostnames are 
> attempted. Can we also do the same for addresses that each of the hosts 
> resolves to, so that backoffs are only applied after connection to each 
> address is attempted once and every address is connected to once using 
> round-robin rather than random selection? This will avoid delays in cases 
> where at least one address can be connected to.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to