[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16587496#comment-16587496
]
Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-1260:
--------------------------------------
-1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12823635/ZOOKEEPER-1260-01.patch
against trunk revision 176bd68222f3a3bddac9deb412eee7f538cb01ca.
+1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
+1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests.
-1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch.
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/3701//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Audit logging in ZooKeeper servers.
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-1260
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1260
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: server
> Reporter: Mahadev konar
> Assignee: Mohammad Arshad
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 3.6.0, 3.5.5
>
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-1260-01.patch, zookeeperAuditLogs.pdf
>
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Lots of users have had questions on debugging which client changed what znode
> and what updates went through a znode. We should add audit logging as in
> Hadoop (look at Namenode Audit logging) to log which client changed what in
> the zookeeper servers. This could just be a log4j audit logger.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)