[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16612748#comment-16612748
 ] 

Fangmin Lv commented on ZOOKEEPER-3127:
---------------------------------------

[~andorm] what's the process for committer to port back the commits? If it 
cannot be clearly applied we always needs a PR for that? Or if it's very 
trivial conflict, we just resolve it when CP and commit directly?

I manually cherry-picked this one on my MAC, there is a very minor conflict in 
QuorumPeerMainTest which is about the private/public of logStates method, I'll 
provide the PR, but I'm more interested to know what's  the procedure here.

> Fixing potential data inconsistency due to update last processed zxid with 
> partial multi-op txn
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-3127
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3127
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: server
>    Affects Versions: 3.5.4, 3.6.0, 3.4.13
>            Reporter: Fangmin Lv
>            Assignee: Fangmin Lv
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 3.6.0
>
>          Time Spent: 1h 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Found this issue while checking the code for another issue, this is a 
> relatively rare case which we haven't seen it on prod so far.
> Currently, the lastProcessedZxid is updated when applying the first txn of 
> multi-op, if there is a snapshot in progress, it's possible that the zxid 
> associated with the snapshot only include partial of the multi op.
> When loading snapshot, it will only load the txns after the zxid associated 
> with snapshot file, which could data inconsistency due to missing sub txns.
> To avoid this, we only update the lastProcessedZxid when the whole multi-op 
> txn is applied to DataTree.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to