Github user hanm commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/590#discussion_r219659934 --- Diff: src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/watch/BitHashSet.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,156 @@ +/** + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one + * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file + * distributed with this work for additional information + * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance + * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and + * limitations under the License. + */ + +package org.apache.zookeeper.server.watch; + +import java.util.BitSet; +import java.util.Set; +import java.util.HashSet; +import java.util.Iterator; +import java.lang.Iterable; + +import org.apache.zookeeper.server.util.BitMap; + +/** + * Using BitSet to store all the elements, and use HashSet to cache limited + * number of elements to find a balance between memory and time complexity. + * + * Without HashSet, we need to to use O(N) time to get the elements, N is + * the bit numbers in elementBits. But we need to keep the size small to make + * sure it doesn't cost too much in memory, there is a tradeoff between --- End diff -- nit `trade off`
---