Github user hanm commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/590#discussion_r219659934
  
    --- Diff: src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/watch/BitHashSet.java 
---
    @@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
    +/**
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
    + * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
    + * distributed with this work for additional information
    + * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
    + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
    + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
    + * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +
    +package org.apache.zookeeper.server.watch;
    +
    +import java.util.BitSet;
    +import java.util.Set;
    +import java.util.HashSet;
    +import java.util.Iterator;
    +import java.lang.Iterable;
    +
    +import org.apache.zookeeper.server.util.BitMap;
    +
    +/**
    + * Using BitSet to store all the elements, and use HashSet to cache limited
    + * number of elements to find a balance between memory and time complexity.
    + *
    + * Without HashSet, we need to to use O(N) time to get the elements, N is
    + * the bit numbers in elementBits. But we need to keep the size small to 
make
    + * sure it doesn't cost too much in memory, there is a tradeoff between
    --- End diff --
    
    nit `trade off`


---

Reply via email to