Github user hanm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/184#discussion_r222841188
--- Diff: src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/common/ZKTrustManager.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.zookeeper.common;
+
+import org.apache.http.conn.ssl.DefaultHostnameVerifier;
+import org.slf4j.Logger;
+import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
+
+import javax.net.ssl.SSLEngine;
+import javax.net.ssl.SSLException;
+import javax.net.ssl.X509ExtendedTrustManager;
+import java.net.InetAddress;
+import java.net.Socket;
+import java.net.UnknownHostException;
+import java.security.cert.CertificateException;
+import java.security.cert.X509Certificate;
+
+/**
+ * A custom TrustManager that supports hostname verification via
org.apache.http.conn.ssl.DefaultHostnameVerifier.
+ *
+ * We attempt to perform verification using just the IP address first and
if that fails will attempt to perform a
+ * reverse DNS lookup and verify using the hostname.
+ */
+public class ZKTrustManager extends X509ExtendedTrustManager {
--- End diff --
I am +1 on @ivmaykov 's approach.
We should create a JIRA and put a comment in code links with JIRA so this
can be cleaned up later, though this sounds a mysterious issue by the
description so far (that performance degrades with new code path not hit?).
---
