[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16813299#comment-16813299
]
maoling commented on ZOOKEEPER-102:
-----------------------------------
Let me revisit this issue. I will test the lasted the
protobuf（[https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/releases/tag/v3.7.1)] to
see how big is the gap.
e.g pick one api(getData()) to change to protobuf to test.
After testing,if the perfermance gap is obvious,we can absorb the experience
from other serialization assembly to improve the existing jute to close them up.
> Need to replace Jute with supported code
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-102
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-102
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Benjamin Reed
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 4.0.0
>
>
> ZooKeeper currently uses Jute to serialize objects to put on the wire and on
> disk. We pulled Jute out of Hadoop and added a C binding. Both versions of
> Jute have evolved (although Hadoop still doesn't have a C binding). It would
> be nice to use a more standard serialization library. Some options include
> Thrift or Google's protocol buffers.
> Our main requirements would be Java and C bindings and good performance. (For
> example, serializing to XML would give us incredibly bad performance and
> would not be acceptible!)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
